Russian Imperial Identity in the Reign of Anna Ioannovna and the Birth of the Petrine Myth

Authors

  • Alexander S. Belousov ITMO University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.303

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the issue of self-identification of the Russian monarchy of the 18th century and its environment. The authorities and elites constantly turned to the symbolic practices of succession to Peter I in the process of acquiring a new imperial identity. They manifested themselves in various forms: legislative acts, calendar, holidays of Peter’s dates, illuminations, etc. The personality of Peter I and adherence to his ideas formed a certain consensus within the political and economic elite, in connection with which the image of the first Russian emperor began to play one of the fundamental roles in the communicative strategies of Russian monarchs of the 18th century. The reign of Anna Ioannovna became a bifurcation point for the mechanism of political self-identification and continuity of the Russian imperial power. In response to the political crisis of 1730, the cult of Peter the Great began to be formed, reflecting the imperial idea of Russia. Anna Ioannovna, taking advantage of the Russian military success in the 1730s, revised the cult to in order to build her own original ideological narrative. It involved emphasizing the empress’s virtues and presenting Russia as the main defender of the Christian world. A subsequent attempt to “debunk” the Petrine cult, on the contrary, led to its strengthening, both among the Russian political elite and a wider strata (guards and officer corps). This finally formed the Petrine myth. The personality of Peter I turned into something transcendent for the political system of the Russian Empire.

Keywords:

Peter I, Anna Ioannovna, Russian monarchy, imperial identity, Peterhof

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Alexander S. Belousov, ITMO University

PhD (History), Associate Professor

References

Литература

Ardikutsa V. E. Fontany Petrodvortsa. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ., 1972, 144 p. (In Russian)

Burkhardt J. Die Friedlosigkeit der Frühen Neuzeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Bellizität Europas. Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung, 1997, no. 24, pp. 509–574.

Dedova E. B. Allegoricheskie obrazy v iskusstve feierverkov i illiuminatsii v Rossii serediny XVIII veka: k problemepanegiricheskogo napravleniia v khudozhestvennoi kul’ture elizavetinskogo vremeni: PhD thesis (History). Moscow, 2011, 30 p. (In Russian)

Grebeniuk V. P. Obzor proizvedenii panegiricheskogo soderzhaniia pervoi chetverti XVIII v. Russkaia staropechatnaia literatura (XVI — pervaia chetvert’ XVIII v.). Panegiricheskaia literatura Petrovskogo vremeni. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 312 p. (In Russian)

Iumangulov V. Ia. Petergofskii Samson. Biografiia pamiatnika. St. Petersburg, Tsvetprint Publ., 2015, 138 p.

Kersnovskii A. A. Istoriia russkoi armii. Vol. 1. Moscow, Golosv Publ., 1992, 304 p. (In Russian)

Krotov P. A. Bitva pri Poltave. St. Petersburg, Istoricheskaia illiustratsiia Publ., 2009, 416 p. (In Russian)

Langevishe D. Chto takoe voina? Evoliutsiia fenomena voiny i ee legitimatsiia v Novoe vremia. Ab Imperio, 2001, no. 4, pp. 7–28. (In Russian)

Letin V. A. Petrovskii tekst usadebnykh proektov serediny XVIII veka: anninskii Peterhof. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana), 2010, no. 4, pp. 102–106. (In Russian)

Moiseeva G. N. Drevnerusskaia literatura v khudozhestvennom soznanii i istoricheskoi mysli Rossii XVIII veka. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980, 262 p. (In Russian)

Nikiforova L. V. Chertogi vlasti. Dvorets v prostranstve kul’tury. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb Publ., 2011, 702 p. (In Russian)

Petrukhintsev N. N. Tsarstvovanie Anny Ioannovny: formirovanie vnutripoliticheskogo kursa i sud’ba armii i flota 1730–1735 g. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 2001, 352 p. (In Russian)

Pliukhanova M. B. Siuzhety i simvoly Moskovskogo tsarstva. St. Petersburg, Akropol’ Publ., 1995, 336 p. (In Russian)

Pogosian E. A. “I nevozmozhnoe vozmozhno”: svad’ba shutov v Ledianom dome kak fakt ofitsial’noi kul’tury. Trudy po russkoi i slavianskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie, vol. IV, Tartu, [s. n.], 2001, pp. 80–109. (In Russian)

Pogosian E. A. Petr I — arkhitektor rossiiskoi istorii. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb Publ., 2001, 424 p. (In Russian)

Raskin A. G. Dusha Petergofa. Fontany i kaskady. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1999, 303 p. (In Russian)

Raskin A. G. Petrodvorets. Dvortsy-muzei, parki, fontany. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ., 1984, 191 p. (In Russian)

Rovinskii D. A. Obozrenie ikonopisaniia v Rossii do kontsa XVII veka. Opisanie feierverkov i illiuminatsii. St. Petersburg, Izdanie A. S. Suvorina, 1903, 303 p. (In Russian)

Sokolov B. G. Gipertekst istorii. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo Publ., 2001, 193 p. (In Russian)

Stavrides Th. The sultan of Vezirs. The life and Times of the Ottoman Grand Vezir Mahmud Pasha Angelovic (1453–1474). Leiden, Boston, Koln, Brill Academic Pub., 2001, 449 p.

Wortman R. Stsenarii vlasti. Mify i tseremonii russkoi monarkhii. Vol. 1. Moscow, OGI Publ., 2002, 605 p.(In Russian)

Zelov D. D. Ofitsial’nye svetskie prazdniki kak iavlenie russkoi kul’tury kontsa XVII — pervoi poloviny XVIII veka: PhD thesis (History). Moscow, 2002, 31 p. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2023-09-27

How to Cite

Belousov, A. S. (2023). Russian Imperial Identity in the Reign of Anna Ioannovna and the Birth of the Petrine Myth. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 68(3), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.303

Issue

Vol. 68 No. 3 (2023)

Section

History of Russia

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.