The Role of Mashtots and Ulfila in the Creation of a New Civilizational Identity

Authors

  • Yervand H. Margaryan Russian-Armenian University
  • Lusine Ye. Margaryan University College Cork, University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.208

Abstract

The article is devoted to two educational movements of the turn of the 4th–5th centuries — Gothic and Armenian. Outstanding enlighteners — Ulfila and Mashtots — were at the origin of these movements and laid the cornerstone in the construction of the national identity of their peoples. In either case, it was a civilizational project designed to put an end to paganism and “latent barbarism” in the periphery of the Roman world, which was rapidly declining. The invention of their own alphabets and the translation of the Holy Scriptures was aimed at organizing a national Church, which in its turn was the main tool for creating a national identity. The introduction of the Goths to the “peoples of the Scriptures” was an initiative, first of all, of Ulfila himself, but his project was actively supported by the Roman authorities. However, there is no indication in the sources that Ulfila’s project was backed by the Gothic elite. In contrast, Mashtots’ educational project from the very beginning met with the approval and active encouragement of all strata of Armenian society, primarily, the church and secular elites, as well as common people. In fact, it was a nationwide project, and the seeds of Armenian enlightenment fell on kindly soil. This explains the surge in Armenian culture in the fifth century.

Keywords:

barbarism, enlightenment, national Church, pre-modern national identity, peoples of the Scriptures, Bible, Mashtots, Ulfila

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biographies

Yervand H. Margaryan, Russian-Armenian University

Dr. Sci. (History), Associate Professor

Lusine Ye. Margaryan, University College Cork, University College

Postdoctoral Fellow

References

Литература

Budanova V. P. Latentnoe varvarstvo: fantom ili real’nost’? Tsivilizatsiia i varvarstvo, 2019, issue VIII, pp. 9–28. (In Russian)

Budanova V. P. Latentnoe varvarstvo: priroda, formy proiavleniia i mesto v istorii. Tsivilizatsiia i varvarstvo,2019, issue VIII, pp. 74–103. (In Russian)

Budanova V. P. Metamorfozy soznaniia cheloveka varvarskogo mira na puti k tsivilizatsii. Tsivilizatsiia i varvarstvo, 2018, issue VII, pp. 7–33. (In Russian)

Derlug’ian G. M. Tupik kak istoricheskaia razvilka vozmozhnostei. Ekspert, 2007, no. 40, pp. 76–82. (In Russian)

Dorostovskii A. O vere, zhizni i konchine Ul’fily. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 2011, no. 4 (41), pp. 105–116. (In Russian)

Elizarova N. M. K voprosu ob istochnikakh rabstva v Rime v I v. do n. e. (po dannym Tsitserona). Antichnyi mir i arkheologiia, 1979, issue 4, pp. 62–70. (In Russian)

Falluomini C. The Gothic Vertion of the Gospel and Pauline Epistles: Cultural Background, Transmission and Character. [S. l.], De Gruyter, 2015, 436 p.

Fletcher R. The Conversion of Europe: From Paganism to Christianity (371–1386 AD). London, Harper Collins Publisher, 1997.

Heather P., Matthews J. The Goths in the Fourth Century, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, 1996, 136 р.

Hengel M. Jews, Greeks and Barbarians. Philadelphia, Fortress, 1980, 186 p.

Hengel M. Judaism and Hellenism. London, SCM Press, 1974, 666 p.

Kallistov D. P., Neikhardt A. A., Shifman I. Sh., Shishova I. A. Rabstvo na periferii antichnogo mira. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1968, 271 p. (In Russian)

Kantor M. Strategiia Leviafana. Moscow, AST Publ., 2014, 446 p. (In Russian)

Kara-Murza A. A. “Novoe varvarstvo” kak problema rossiiskoi tsivilizatsii. Moscow, IFRAN Press, 1995, 221 p. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Ellinizm i ego transformatsii. Problemy periodizatsii, universalizatsii i preemstvennosti, book I. Yerevan, AN RA Press, 2021, 368 p. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Iazyk i pis’mennost’ kak politicheskii instrument. “Umnaia sila” protiv varvarskoi interventsional’nosti. Caucaso-Caspica. Trudy po Kavkazsko-Kaspiiskomu regionu, issue V. Yerevan, RAU Press, 2020, pp. 27–64 (In Russian)

Margarian E. G. Iz istorii britanskikh issledovanii ellinizma. Dialog so vremenem, 2021, issue 74, pp. 169–184. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Iz istorii frantsuzskikh ellinisticheskikh issledovanii. Dialog so vremenem: al’manakh intellektual’noi istorii, 2022, issue, 78, pp. 102–117. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Khristianskie sviatye v brone i s parameriem nagolo: obraz voina-ispovednika v vizantiiskoi ikonografii (1). Prievfratskaia pogranichnaia zona i khristianstvo. Vizual’naia teologiia, 2022, vol. 4,no. 1, pp. 39–57. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Obraz vraga v rimskoi literature epokhi printsipata. Kritika i semiotika, no. 2. Novosibirsk, Moscow, Institut filologii Sibirskogo otdeleniia RAN Press, Novosibirskii gosuniversitet Press, RGGU Press, 2015, pp. 367–383. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Poiski ideal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obustroistva v ellinisticheskoi Armenii: utopiia i real’nost’. Natsional’naia ideia, 2008, no. 1, pp. 64–75. (In Russian)

Margarian E. Teoriia i praktika sotsial’nogo ustroistva ellinisticheskoi Armenii. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii: teorii i metody istoricheskoi nauki: shag v XXI vek. Moscow, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences Press, 2008, pp. 351–353. (In Russian)

Margaryan Ye. Introduction. On the Borders of World-Systems: Contact Zones in Ancient and in Ancient and Modern Times. Oxford, Archaeopress, 2020, 148 p.

Margaryan Ye. The Euphrates frontier in the Bysantine period. Undergoing the new reality. On the Borders of World-Systems: Contact Zones in Ancient and Modern Times. Oxford, ArchaeoPress, 2020, рр. 6–58.

Neigebauer O. Tochnye nauki v drevnosti. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968, 224 p. (In Russian)

Nemirovskii A. A. Kappadokiicy i Kappadokiia: k formirovaniiu etnopoliticheskoi karty drevnei Anatolii. Oriens, 1999, issue 6, pp. 1–13. (In Russian)

Nikishin V. O. “Natsional’nyi vopros” v proizvedeniiakh Tatsita. Drevnii Vostok i antichnyi mir: trudy kafedry istorii Drevnego mira istoricheskogo fakul’teta MGU, 2001, issue 4, pp. 93–108. (In Russian)

Nikishin V. O. Chuzhezemtsy v proizvedeniiakh Tsitserona, Tsezaria i Salliustiia (k voprosu o sushchnosti rimskogo “shovinizma” v I v. do n. e.). PhD thesis (History). Moscow, 2000, 246 p. (In Russian)

Nikishin V. O. Elliny, rimliane i varvary: evoliutsiia poniatii v epokhu rimskogo vladychestva. Stavropol Almanac of the Society of Intellectual History, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 56–67. (In Russian)

Ol’derogge D. A. Iz istorii armiano-efiopskikh sviazei (Alfavit Mashtotsa). Drevnii Vostok, 1975, issue 1, pp. 208–218. (In Russian)

Rozhanskii I. D. Rasizm i Drevniaia Gretsiia. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki, 1995, no. 2, pp. 58–65.(In Russian)

Shevchenko V. N. Tsivilizatsiia vs latentnoe varvarstvo i tsivilizatsionnyi proekt. Problemy tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiia, 2021, no. 2, pp. 30–48. (In Russian)

Stepanyan A. A. Razvitie istoricheskoi mysli v drevnei Armenii: mif, ratsionalizm, istoriopisanie. Yerevan, Akademiia nauk Armenii Press, 1991, 251 p. (In Russian)

Stepanyan A. A. The agreement “Family-state” in the Armenian public thought of the 5th century. Movses Khorenatsi. Iran Nameh, 1993, no. 6, pp. 21–23. (In Armenian)

Yeremyan S. T. The beginning of Armenian writing and literature. The history of the Armenian people, vol. II. Yerevan, Publishing House of the Armenian SSR, 1984, pp. 423–439. (In Armenian)

Published

2023-06-07

How to Cite

Margaryan, Y. H., & Margaryan, L. Y. (2023). The Role of Mashtots and Ulfila in the Creation of a New Civilizational Identity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 68(2), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.208

Issue

Section

World History