Cyclic Concepts of Russian History in Modern Historiography

Authors

  • Boris N. Mironov St Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.108

Abstract

In post-Soviet historiography, the concept of the cyclic pendulum, or inversion, of Russia’s development has become widespread. According to it, Russia, unlike the West, is characterized not by progressive, but by spasmodic pendulum development: progress is replaced by reaction, movement goes in a vicious circle. The article verifies four variants of the concept and makes conclusions about its strengths and weaknesses. Three most significant shortcomings are noted. The first is anti-historicism: fundamental changes that took place in the Russian society are ignored, which contradicts the principle of historicism. The second is Eurocentrism: the West is idealized and regarded as the highest manifestation of civilization, as a model for imitation and comparison, and deviations from this model, reforms that do not lead to Westernization, are condemned. The third is apriorism, weak empirical validity: explanations in most cases are hypothetical, even guesswork. The main methodological strategies are comparison, analogy, good examples, deduction as a selective ordering of facts to substantiate a certain hypothesis. Historians, as a rule, consider such methods to be unreliable, opening up opportunities for many ill-founded hypotheses. The concept objectively reflects the characteristic features of the Russian historical process: the presence of cycles; the pulsating nature of the reform; widespread authoritarian management style; low general culture of the population; the great role of traditional institutions, popular political culture and specific cognitive practices; strong historical inertia — dependence on the past path, due to civilizational stereotypes. However, the shortcomings inherent in the Russian society are exaggerated, and achievements are minimized. The imbalance creates a bias, and the representation of the course of Russian history is inadequate.

Keywords:

reforms and counter-reforms in Russia, turmoil and revolutions, A. S. Akhiezer, I. I. Glebova, A. Yu. Dvornichenko, V. V. Ilyin

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Boris N. Mironov, St Petersburg State University

Dr. Sci. (History), Professor

References

Литература

Akhiezer A. S. Rossiia: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (Sotsiokul’turnaia dinamika Rossii), vol. 1. Novosibirsk, Sibirskii khronograf Publ., 1997, 804 p. (In Russian)

Baev V. G. Bismark o pravovom polozhenii korolia Prussii v konstitutsionnoi monarkhii (Germaniia. Vtoraiapolovina XIX veka). Sovremennoe pravo, 2008, no. 6, pp. 112–116. (In Russian)

Bullard A. The Russian Pendulum: Autocracy, Democracy, Bolshevism. New York, Macmillan, 1919, 272 p.(In Russian)

Carr E. N. Socialism in One Country, 1924–1926, vol. 1. New York, The Macmillan Company, 1958, 558 p.(In Russian)

Dvornichenko A. Iu. Proshchanie s revoliutsiei. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 2018, 271 p.

Dvornichenko A. Iu. Smuta kak faktor rossiiskoi istorii. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, issue 3, pp. 677–701. (In Russian)

Filatov V. P. Osobennosti liberalizatsii i modernizatsii Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX — nachale XX v. v kontekste evropeiskogo razvitiia. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniia, 2006, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 57–76.(In Russian)

Filiushkin A. I. Izobretaia pervuiu voinu Rossii i Evropy: Baltiiskie voiny vtoroi poloviny XVI v. glazami sovremennikov i potomkov. St Petersburg, Dm. Bulanin Publ., 2013, 845 p. (In Russian)

Fogel’ R., Engerman S. Khoziaistvennaia effektivnost’ rabstva: sravnenie severnogo i iuzhnogo sel’skogo khoziaistva v SShA v 1860 g. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniia, 2004, no. 1-2, pp. 100–106. (In Russian)

Glebova I. I. Rannii postsovetizm v politiko-istoricheskom kontekste. Moscow, INION RAN Press, 2006, 259 p. (In Russian)

Guliev M. A., Epifanstev S. N., Samygin S. I. Sotsiologiia i psikhologiia upravleniia. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2006, 408 p. (In Russian)

Il’in V. I. Struktura istoricheskoi kolei Rossii: problemy metodologii. Mir Rossii, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 30–50. (In Russian)

Il’in V. V. Panorama otechestvennykh reform. Il’in V. V., Panarin A. S., Akhiezer A. S. Reformy i kontrreformy v Rossii: Tsikly modernizatsionnogo protsessa. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1996, pp. 13–172. (In Russian)

Il’in V. V. Skvoznye linii. Il’in V. V., Panarin A. S., Akhiezer A. S. Reformy i kontrreformy v Rossii: Tsikly modernizatsionnogo protsessa. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1996, pp. 173–204. (In Russian)

Khanin G. I. Dinamika ekonomicheskogo razvitiia SSSR. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1991, 268 p. (In Russian)

L’iuis P. D. Delovye kul’tury v mezhdunarodnom biznese: Ot stolknoveniia k vzaimoponimaniiu. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2001, 448 p. (In Russian)

Labutina T. L. Anglichane v dopetrovskoi Rossii. St Petersburg, Aletheia Publ., 2011, 268 p. (In Russian)

Leonard K. Zaniatiia pomeshchich’ikh krest’ian na severe Tsentral’no-promyshlennogo raiona Rossii nakanune reformy (na primere Iaroslavskoi gubernii). Agrarnaia evoliutsiia Rossii i SShA v XIX — nachale XX veka: materialy sovetsko-amerikanskikh simpoziumov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 233–249. (In Russian)

Litvak B. G. Russkaia derevnia v reforme 1861 goda: Chernozemnyi tsentr 1861–1895 gg. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972, 423 p. (In Russian)

Marchenia P. P. K voprosu o sootnoshenii kontseptov smuty i revoliutsii v sovremennom otechestvennom sotsiogumanitarnom znanii. Filosofskie issledovaniia i sovremennost’, issue 10. Moscow, IPL Press, 2021, pp. 87–94. (In Russian)

Markevich A., Kharrison M. Pervaia mirovaia voina, Grazhdanskaia voina i vosstanovlenie: natsional’nyi dokhod Rossii v 1913–1928 gg. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 2013, 109 p. (In Russian)

Matveeva S. Ia. Raskolotoe obshchestvo: put’ i sud’ba Rossii v sotsiokul’turnoi teorii Aleksandra Akhiezera. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiia: kritika istoricheskogo opyta, vol. 1. Novosibirsk, Sibirskii khronograf Publ., 1997,pp. 3–41. (In Russian)

Miliukov P. N. Istoriia vtoroi russkoi revoliutsii. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2001, 765 p.

Mironov B. N. Blagosostoianie naseleniia i revoliutsii v imperskoi Rossii: XVIII — nachalo XX veka. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 2012, 848 p. (In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Dostizheniia i provaly rossiiskoi ekonomiki v gody Pervoi mirovoi voiny. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 3, pp. 463–480. (In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Kul’turnyi kapital Rossii za tysiachu let. Ekonomicheskaia politika, 2013, no. 1, pp. 62–95.(In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Pogruzivshaia v smutu i ukravshaia pobedu revoliutsiia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2017, vol. 62, issue 4, pp. 693–716. (In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Rossiiskaia imperiia: Ot traditsii k modernu, vol. 1. St Petersburg, Dm. Bulanin Publ., 892 p.(In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Rossiiskaia imperiia: Ot traditsii k modernu, vol. 2. St Petersburg, Dm. Bulanin Publ., 907 p.(In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Rossiiskaia imperiia: Ot traditsii k modernu, vol. 3. St Petersburg, Dm. Bulanin Publ., 989 p.(In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Rossiiskaia modernizatsiia i revoliutsiia. St Petersburg, Dm. Bulanin Publ., 2019, 528 p.(In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Russkaia revoliutsiia 1917 goda v kontekste teorii revoliutsii. Pt 1. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2013, no. 2, pp. 72–84. (In Russian)

Mironov B. N. Russkaia revoliutsiia 1917 goda v kontekste teorii revoliutsii. Pt 2. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2013, no. 3, pp. 106–115. (In Russian)

Naumova N. F. Retsidiviruiushchaia modernizatsiia v Rossii: Beda, vina ili resurs chelovechestva? Moscow,Editorial URSS Publ., 1999, 174 p. (In Russian)

Panarin A. T. Politologiia. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 1998, 407 p. (In Russian)

Pantin V. I., Lapkin V. V. Filosofiia istoricheskogo prognozirovaniia: Ritmy istorii i perspektivy mirovogo razvitiia v pervoi polovine XX veka. Dubna, Feniks Publ., 2006, 448 p. (In Russian)

Potkina I. V. V preddverii katastrofy. Gosudarstvo i ekonomika Rossii v 1914–1917 godakh. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ., 2022, 379 p. (In Russian)

Rozov N. S. Tsiklichnost’ rossiiskoi politicheskoi istorii kak bolezn’: vozmozhno li vyzdorovlenie? Polis, 2006, no. 2, pp. 74–89. (In Russian)

Shlezinger A. M. Tsikly amerikanskoi istorii. Moscow, Progress-Akademiia Publ., 1992, 687 p. (In Russian)

Sogrin V. V., Zvereva G. I., Repina L. P. Sovremennaia istoriografiia Velikobritanii. Moscow, Nauka Publ.,1991, 225 p. (In Russian)

Travin D., Margariia O. Evropeiskaia modernizatsiia, vol. 1. Moscow, AST Publ.; St Petersburg, Terra Fantastica Publ., 2004, 665 p. (In Russian)

Vul’f L. Izobretaia Vostochnuiu Evropu: Karta tsivilizatsii v soznanii epokhi Prosveshcheniia. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2003, 548 p. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2023-04-07

How to Cite

Mironov, B. N. (2023). Cyclic Concepts of Russian History in Modern Historiography. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 68(1), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.108

Issue

Vol. 68 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Discussions

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.