Informal Ties in Party-State Bureaucracy of Yugoslavia

Authors

  • Yurii Shakhin Sevastopol State University

Abstract

The article investigates informal ties among the Yugoslav party-state bureaucracy in 1945–1965 in order to identify their influence on the disintegration processes in Yugoslavia. Interaction through unofficial channels was based on solid social-cultural preconditions and played a significant role in the life of the country. Informal ties could be formed due to military service or employment, family or friendship connections, but ties of compatriot character are most fully represented in the sources. They were lined up on a vertical basis in accordance with the existing administrative-territorial division and were predominately used to achieve some kind of material benefits. Until the early 1950s, compatriot ties could be used both in the interests of the center and subordinate regions, but afterwards only the latter option remained, so they quickly turned into a mechanism of lobbying regional interests in central bodies. Compatriot ties were closely intertwined with parochialism and particularism and fueled by the mood of the masses. For example, there were difficulties in nominating candidates of non-local origin during elections. There were politicians who did not follow the requests of their compatriots,
but presumably they were in minority. Since the 1950s, there had been a tendency to institutionally include compatriot ties in the governing bodies, in particular, the principle of proportional regional representation had been established in state and party bodies. Already in the early 1960s this course undermined the efficiency of the central government. To which extent this result was determined by the role of compatriot ties system or other factors has yet to be researched, but it can be stated that the system of informal ties became one of the factors in the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

Keywords:

federal Yugoslavia, party-state bureaucracy, informal ties, compatriot ties, lobbying interests

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yurii Shakhin, Sevastopol State University

PhD (History), Associate Professor

References


References

Easter G. M. Sovetskoe gosudarstvennoe stroitel’stvo. Sistema lichnykh sviazei i samoidentifikatsiia elity v Sovetskoi Rossii. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2010, 255 p. (In Russian)

Gabrič A. Socialistična kulturna revolucija: slovenska kulturna politika 1953–1962. Ljubljana, Cankarjeva založba, 1995, 373 p.

Dimich L. Istorija srpske drzhavnosti, vol. 3. Novi Sad, Ogranak SANU, Drushtvo istorichara Juzhnobachkog i Sremskog okruga, Beseda, 2001, 472 p. (In Serbian)

Djordjevich M. Sedam levih godina. Beograd, Nash dom, 2000, 520 p. (In Serbian)

Končar R., Boarov D. Stevan Doronjski: odbrana autonomiie Voivodine. Novi Sad, Muzei Voivodine, 2011, 879 p. (In Serbian)

Kuljić T. Tito: sociološkoistoriiska studiia. Beograd, Institut za političke studiie, 1998, 394 p. (In Serbian)

Lerotić Z. Jugoslavenska politička klasa i federalizam. Zagreb, Globus, 1989, 289 p.

Markovich P. J. Istoriiske (ne)prilike. Iskustva proshlosti u prouchavaniu sadashniosti. Beograd, Institut za savremenu istoriiu, Arhipelag, 2018, 384 p. (In Serbian)

Mujadžević D. Bakarić. Politička biografija. Slavonski Brod, Zagreb, Hrvatski institut za povijest, Podružnica za povijest Slavonije, Srijema i Baranje, 2011, 383 p.

Volkov V. K. Tragediia Iugoslavii. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 3–32. (In Russian)

Volkov V. Etnonomenklatura i raspad gosudarstva: SSSR i Iugoslaviia. Svobodnaia mysl’ — ХХІ, 2000, vol. 9, pp. 57–73; vol. 10, pp. 13–24. (In Russian)

Published

2022-11-04

How to Cite

Shakhin, Y. (2022). Informal Ties in Party-State Bureaucracy of Yugoslavia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 67(3), 847–862. Retrieved from https://history-journal.spbu.ru/article/view/14704

Issue

Section

World History