Discourse of Loyalty, Subjecthood and Citizenship: from Medieval to Modern Practices

Authors

  • Milica Radulović University of Niš

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2022.315

Abstract

The article discusses historical, linguistic, and discursive aspects of the nouns loyalty, subjecthood, and citizenship. Тhe focus is on the historical lexico-semantic changes of the three nouns, which demonstrate that denotations are modified in different historical contexts. The analysis starts with D. Sperber and D. Wilson’s assumption that the correspondence between concepts and words may be one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, or a combination of these since it is quite implausible that there is an exhaustive one-to-one mapping between mental concepts and public words. Words can be used in different contexts and discourses, and the synchronic semasiological approach may not always provide the full specification of word meaning, especially when the meaning of abstract nouns is analyzed. As argued by H.-J. Schmid, the formation of concrete concepts is different from the formation of abstract concepts, the latter being more complex as it can depend on many different experiences, which can make it difficult to form a single stable abstract concept. In the report on their experiments, S. J. Crutch and E. K. Warrington’s assertion would be that abstract concepts are represented in an associative neural network while concrete concepts have a categorical organization. This suggests that concrete words are more likely to be understood adequately, and, vice versa, abstract words —
inadequately. Moreover, our understanding of words and the world can change over time because our experiences and historical circumstances can and do change. This article considers the issue of abstract concept-formation with regard to both synchronic and diachronic lexico-semantic aspects of the nouns loyalty, subjecthood, and citizenship. These aspects are analyzed in accordance with the lexico-semantic frameworks provided by the second editionof the University of Glasgow’s Historical Thesaurus of English. The aim is to demonstrate that the meanings of the three nouns can be understood more adequately if their lexico-semantic features are compared and contrasted not only synchronically but also diachronically. Another aim is to show that a better understanding of the nouns relies on both synchronically and diachronically contextualized knowledge.

Keywords:

loyalty, subjecthood, citizenship, concept, lexico-semantic features, synchronic, diachronic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Milica Radulović, University of Niš

PhD, Assistant Professor

References


References

Barron C. M. The political culture of medieval London. Medieval London: Collected papers of Caroline M. Barron. Kalamazoo, Western Michigan University, 2017, pp. 513–544.

Bellamy R. Introduction: The theories and practices of citizenship. Citizenship: Critical concepts in political science, vol. I. London, New York, Routledge, 2014, pp. 1–19.

Biber D., Conrad S., Leech G. Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited, 2002, 487 p.

Clavier S. W. Royalism, religion and revolution: Wales, 1640–1688. Woodbridge, The Boydell Press, 2021, 266 p.

Cruse A. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, 441 p.

Crutch S. J., Warrington E. K. Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 2005, vol. 128, issue 3, pp. 615–627.

Cust R. Charles I: A Political Life. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited, 2005, 488 p.

Fortson IV B. W. An approach to semantic change. The handbook of historical linguistics, Malden, Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 648–666.

Geeraerts D. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, 341 p.

Hartmann R. R. K., James G. Dictionary of lexicography. London, New York, Routledge, 1998, 176 p.

Kim K. Aliens in medieval law: the origins of modern citizenship. Cambride, Cambridge University Press, 2000, 262 p.

Labov W. The boundaries of words and their meanings. New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, Georgetown University Press, 1973, pp. 340–373.

Pocock J. G. A. The ideal of citizenship since classical times. Citizenship: Critical concepts in political science, vol. I. London, New York, Routledge, 2014, pp. 67–85.

Prćić T. Semantika i pragmatika reči. Novi Sad, Zmaj, 2008, 191 p.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London, New York, Longman, 1985, 1779 p.

Saussure F., de. Course in general linguistics. New York, Columbia University Press, 1959, 240 p.

Schmid H.-J. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, 457 p.

Sperber D., Wilson D. A deflationary account of metaphors. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 84–105.

Sperber D., Wilson D. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 184–200.

Urban M. Lexical semantic change and semantic reconstruction. The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. London, New York, Routledge, 2015, pp. 374–392.

Vromen A. Digital citizenship and political engagement: The challenge from online campaigning and advocacy organisations. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 278 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-04

How to Cite

Radulović, M. (2022). Discourse of Loyalty, Subjecthood and Citizenship: from Medieval to Modern Practices. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 67(3), 930–944. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2022.315

Issue

Section

Historiography, Source Studies and Methods of Historical Research