Kievan Conservative Journalists on the Problems of Education in Late Imperial Russia

Authors

  • Aleksandr E. Kotov St. Petersburg State University
  • Dmitrij A. Fedorov St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.404

Abstract

Educational issues traditionally lay in the centre in the discourse of the Russian conservatism in the 19th century. Representatives of its different trends (Slavophiles, Katkov’s followers, aristocrates) regularly emphasized that this sphere was the key to resolving most of the problems the country faced: the necessity to develop the country and at the same time to “protect” — not only the existing political regime but also the historical continuity, national and spiritual values. The objects of criticism of conservative publicists were, as a rule, new trends in the educational sphere. However, the methods of dealing with them were perceived differently by different conservatives. In the end, the program of M. N. Katkov, which implied the spread of the classical model of the secondary school and the transformation of universities according
to the German model, won. However, it aroused serious objections in conservative circles as well. The elementary school, which most conservatives traditionally associated with the Orthodox clergy, caused the least controversy. Regional specifics also played their role: educational issues were intertwined with the national ones as in the western periphery university and school were perceived as tools of combating “Polonism”. At the same time, one of the first demands of the Ukrainophiles was schooling in the “Little Russian dialect”. The press of the “Russian direction” actively opposed this — first of all, “Moskovskie Vedomosti” and “Novoe Vremia”. The largest regional conservative newspaper “Kievlianin”, founded by V. Ya. Shulgin, generally followed their program under his successor D. I. Pikhno but took a special view on
educational issues, while showing a significant degree of independence and even liberalism. The latter was not only a consequence of the personal position of the editors. Publicism of “Kievlianin” reflected the views of the circle of Russian nationalist intelligentsia formed in post-reform Kiiv who managed to help the authorities solve the problem of “de-Polonization” of the Southern-Western territory but played a role in the subsequent great upheavals.

Keywords:

conservatism, nationalism, university question, parochial schools, education reforms, Pikhno, Shulgin, Katkov, “Kievlianin”, western outskirts

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biographies

Aleksandr E. Kotov, St. Petersburg State University

Dr. Sci. (History), Professor

Dmitrij A. Fedorov, St. Petersburg State University

Graduate Student, Research Laboratory Assistant

References

Литература

Ivanov A. A., Kotov A. E., Yanchenko D. G., Ovsjannikov D. V. Ukrainian question in the Russian conservative thought. The end of XIX — early XX century. Bylye Gody, 2017, vol. 43, issue 1, pp. 129–138. (In Russian)

Kotov A. E. The Problem of Nihilism in the Conservative-Democratic Discourse of the 1860s–1890s. Bylye Gody, 2019, vol. 52, issue 2, pp. 695–701. (In Russian)

Dmitriev A. P. N. P. Giliarov-Platonov i russkaia literatura 1850—1880-kh godov. St. Petersburg, Rodnik Publ., 2018, 912 p. (In Russian)

Zaionchkovskii P. A. Rossiiskoe samoderzhavie v kontse XIX stoletiia (politicheskaia reaktsiia 80-kh — nachala 90-kh godov). Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1970, 444 p. (In Russian)

Kotov A. E. “Tsarskii put’” Mikhaila Katkova: Ideologiia biurokraticheskogo natsionalizma v politicheskoi publitsistike 1860–1890-kh godov. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2016, 487 p. (In Russian)

Miller A. I. “Ukrainskii vopros” v politike vlastei i russkom obshchestvennom mnenii (vtoraia polovina XIX

veka). St. Petersburg, Aletheia Publ., 2000, 267 p. (In Russian)

Natsional’nye okrainy v politike Rossiiskoi imperii i russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli, еd. by A. T. Urushadze. Rostov-na-Donu, Iuznyi Nauchnyi Tsentr Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk Press, 2020, 608 p. (In Russian)

Novikov M. V., Perfil’eva T. B. “Universitetskii vopros” v 1866–1884 gg. Iaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 2014, no. 1, vol. 1, pp. 22–33. (In Russian)

Rostovtsev E. A. Stolichnyi universitet Rossiiskoi imperii: uchenoe soslovie, obshchestvo i vlast’ (vtoraia polovina XIX — nachalo XX v.). Moscow, Politicheskaia entsiklopediia Publ., 2017, 903 p. (In Russian)

Smirnov V. Z. Reforma nachal’noi i srednei shkoly v 60-kh godakh XIX v. Moscow, Akademiia pedagogicheskih nauk RSFSR Press, 1954, 310 p. (In Russian)

Fedorov D. A. Dmitrii Ivanovich Pikhno — redaktor-izdatel’ gazety “Kievlianin” (1879–1913 gg.). Izvestiia Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 157–167. (In Russian)

Fedorov D. A. Publitsistika gazety “Kievlianin” o problemakh nachal’nogo shkol’nogo obrazovaniia v Iugo-Zapadnom krae (60–70-e gg. XIX v.). Vestnik MGPU, Istoricheskie nauki, 2022, no. 4 (48), pp. 111–121. (In Russian)

Shchetinina G. I. Universitety v Rossii i ustav 1884 goda. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976, 231 p. (In Russian)

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Kotov, A. E., & Fedorov, D. A. (2023). Kievan Conservative Journalists on the Problems of Education in Late Imperial Russia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 68(4), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.404

Issue

Section

Round table