The Russian Empire as a Regulator of the Hajj and Russian Orthodox Pilgrimage

Authors

  • Oleg V. Anisimov St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.215

Abstract

The work by Eileen Kane on the Russian Empire’s experience of regulating the hajj — the Muslim pilgrimage from the Volga region, the Caucasus, and Central Asia to the Middle East — is of interest not only from the perspective of Asian and African studies or the history of religion. It is also, potentially, a comparative study as the author illustrates her observations and conclusions by referring to Russia’s policies towards the Christian populations of the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. E. Kane advances a debatable thesis that Russia provided unofficial support for the hajj undertaken by its subjects. Whereas the patronage of Russian Orthodox pilgrimage was fully in line with Russia’s geopolitical role in the Middle East as well as with the tsarist ideology, open declaration of its interest in an organized hajj was out of the question for the Russian government. The idea of regulating the hajj was consistent with Russia’s need to integrate its Muslim subjects into the empire in order to secure the imperial rule. In the Ottoman Empire, adherents of various religions united under one dynasty and entitled to its consular protection can be viewed from the perspective of comparative historical research and the authorities’ general idea of imperial unity. In this case, the modes of comparison can be the following: the appropriation by the authorities of the traditions of pilgrimage and the hajj; their modernization; controversies in implementing the policies; consular protection; the subjugation of the clergy to the imperial bureaucracy. The profound differences between the two religious cultures, Christianity and Islam, resulted in the differences between Russia’s Muslim and Orthodox presence in the Middle East. In the late 19th century, Orthodox subjects of the tsar upon arriving at the destination of their pilgrimage, were offered the services
of the Imperial Orthodox Palestine Society: they could use the accommodation owned by the “Russian Palestine”, and were provided with spiritual guidance by the Russian Orthodox ecclesiastical mission in Jerusalem. Muslim subjects of the tsar did not enjoy the same level of official protection.

Keywords:

Russian Empire, Islam, pilgrimage, Eastern Orthodox Christianity, hajj, Ottoman Empire, Central Asia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Oleg V. Anisimov, St. Petersburg State University

PhD (History)

References

Литература

Aleeva A. Kh. Tatarskaia palomnicheskaia literatura (khadzhname). Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2009, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 498–502. (In Russian)

Anisimov O. V. Rossiia i Napoleon III: bor’ba za sviatye mesta Palestiny. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2014, 416 p.(In Russian)

Astafieva E. Found and buy, study and appropriate, build and reconfigure: The three stages in turning the “Coptic domain” in Jerusalem into the Church of Saint Alexander Nevsky (1856–1896). European Journal of Turkish Studies. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/6195 (accessed: 01.09.2022).

Bobrovnikov V. O. Russkii Kavkaz i frantsuzskii Alzhir: sluchainoe skhodstvo ili obmen opytom kolonial’nogo stroitel’stva? Imperium inter pares: rol’ transferov v istorii Rossiiskoi imperii (1700–1917).Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2010, pp. 182–209. (In Russian)

Chantre L. [Review of Russian Hajj. Empire and the Pilgrimage to Mecca, by E. Kane]. Revue d’histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, 2017, no. 64 (4), pp. 224–226.

Iakushev M. M. Russkoe pravoslavnoe palomnichestvo na Blizhnii Vostok. 1774–1847. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2018, 512 p. (In Russian)

Kane E. M. Pilgrims, Holy Places, and the Multi-Confessional Empire: Russian Policy toward the Ottoman Empire under Tsar Nicholas I, 1825–1855. PhD thesis [S. l.], [s. n.], 2005, 170 p.

Kane E. M. Russian Hajj: Empire and the Pilgrimage to Mecca. Ithaca, Cornell Press, 2015, 256 p.

Khodarkovskii M. M. V chem Rossiia “operezhala” Evropu, ili Rossiia kak kolonial’naia imperiia. Politicheskaia kontseptologiia, 2013, no. 2, pp. 88–89. (In Russian)

Kruz T. Za proroka i tsaria. Islam i imperiia v Rossii i Tsentral’noi Azii. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2020, 408 p. (In Russian)

Lisovoi N. N., Smirnova I. Iu. Rossiia i Sviataia Zemlia v pervoi polovine XIX veka: tserkovnaia politika na Pravoslavnom Vostoke. Moscow, St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ., 2015, 776 p. (In Russian)

Litvinov V. P. Islam v tsarskoi Rossii: palomnichestvo musul’man Srednei Azii. Yelets, Yelets State UniversityPress, 2022, 204 p. (In Russian)

Low M. Ch. Imperial Mecca: Ottoman Arabia and the Indian Ocean. New York, Columbia University Press, 2020, 392 p.

Meyer J. H. [Review of Russian Hajj: Empire and the Pilgrimage to Mecca]. The American Historical Review, 2017, no. 122 (3), pp. 807–808.

Naumkin V. Russian Diplomat at the Consulate of the Russian Empire in Jeddah.Modern and Contemporary History, 2020, no. 5, pp. 61–75.

Shapovalov M. S., Bokatov A. Iu., Valitov A. A. Novye Ierusalimy i Vtoraia Palestina v XI–XX v. Voobrazhaia Palestinu: Sviataia zemlia i russkaia identichnost’ v XIX — nachale XXI v. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia Publ., 2021, pp. 30–99. (In Russian)

Vakh K. A. Aziatskii departament MID i russkie palomniki v Palestine: vzgliad iz Peterburga, Konstantinopolia i Ierusalima. 200 let diplomaticheskoi podderzhke russkogo prisutstviia na Blizhnem Vostoke: istoriia sozdaniia i deiatel’nosti Aziatskogo departamenta MID Rossiiskoi imperii. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2019, pp. 261–328. (In Russian)

Vakh K. A. Tserkovnoe predstavitel’stvo Rossii na Pravoslavnom Vostoke: apokrisiarii v Konstantinopole ili Russkaia Dukhovnaia Missiia v Ierusalime? (K postanovke voprosa). Pravoslavnyi palestinskii sbornik, 2014, issue 110, pp. 21–62. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2023-06-09

How to Cite

Anisimov, O. V. (2023). The Russian Empire as a Regulator of the Hajj and Russian Orthodox Pilgrimage. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 68(2), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.215

Issue

Section

Reviews